<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MIG Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/medic/mig/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/medic/mig/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts on microstructure imaging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:24:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The great diffraction distraction by Matt Hall</title>
		<link>http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/medic/mig/blog/?p=18&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/medic/mig/blog/?p=18#comment-3</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d be interesting to see how the GPD approximation would cope when multiple radii are present. With multiple radii the diffraction pattern becomes far more difficult to interpret but the GPD might still be tractable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be interesting to see how the GPD approximation would cope when multiple radii are present. With multiple radii the diffraction pattern becomes far more difficult to interpret but the GPD might still be tractable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
